Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstracts (1) (Imagicity 1096).jpg
c
← Older revision
Revision as of 11:34, 27 March 2013
Line 8:
Line 8:
:::::No problem, this was from a store front in Melbourne. I'm sure if we ask Graham he will tell us which shop it was. If I go to the effort of doing this, would that resolve your concern for this set of unusual photographs? Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
:::::No problem, this was from a store front in Melbourne. I'm sure if we ask Graham he will tell us which shop it was. If I go to the effort of doing this, would that resolve your concern for this set of unusual photographs? Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
::::::No it wouldn't, because to be useful as an educational picture of ''colourful store fronts'' (if that is a topic about which someone might want to be educated), the photograph would need to show a store front. Frankly, I think you're grasping at straws with no clearly definable potential educational purpose. This is simply an abstract photo, of a graphic design. It's pretty, but not in scope. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
::::::No it wouldn't, because to be useful as an educational picture of ''colourful store fronts'' (if that is a topic about which someone might want to be educated), the photograph would need to show a store front. Frankly, I think you're grasping at straws with no clearly definable potential educational purpose. This is simply an abstract photo, of a graphic design. It's pretty, but not in scope. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:::::::I just think that there is a reasonable interpretation of scope that covers this photograph. It is not my photograph, I would not be devastated if it gets deleted. I agree with you, it looks good, and it is from a photographer with a good track record of high quality photographs. I'm sorry if you feel that is grasping at straws, I would rather say that we have different interpretations of the details of where the boundaries of project scope lie. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 11:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)