Commons:Deletion requests/File:1302 Eindhoven - HTC 045.jpg

← Older revision
Revision as of 17:04, 15 March 2013
Line 1:
Line 1:
 

 

 
=== [[:File:1302 Eindhoven - HTC 045.jpg]] ===
 
=== [[:File:1302 Eindhoven - HTC 045.jpg]] ===
−
Explicit advertizing - This user has uploaded 1000s of pictures that all have advertizing for his website as a watermark. Please remove all of those uploaded pictures. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 15:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
+
Explicit advertizing - This user has uploaded over 55,000s pictures that all have advertizing for his website as a watermark. Please remove all of those uploaded pictures. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 15:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:I might mention that a LOT of images get uploaded here that contain a watermark explicitly advertising a web site. The difference being maybe just in the sheer volume of images from a single uploader. To the uploader of these images... watermarks, for all practical purposes, are not allowed on Commons. Though whether by design or by neglect, Commons is rather weak and unclear in telling you this. Your "offense" is as much our fault as yours, in my opinion. Also, many many hours of editor time is going to be wasted removing all those watermarks. There are better ways to attribute yourself other than plastering a watermark all over uploaded images. And arguably, those images are ''less'' likely to be used ''anywhere'' simply because they do contain such a watermark. – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 16:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:I might mention that a LOT of images get uploaded here that contain a watermark explicitly advertising a web site. The difference being maybe just in the sheer volume of images from a single uploader. To the uploader of these images... watermarks, for all practical purposes, are not allowed on Commons. Though whether by design or by neglect, Commons is rather weak and unclear in telling you this. Your "offense" is as much our fault as yours, in my opinion. Also, many many hours of editor time is going to be wasted removing all those watermarks. There are better ways to attribute yourself other than plastering a watermark all over uploaded images. And arguably, those images are ''less'' likely to be used ''anywhere'' simply because they do contain such a watermark. – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 16:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::Communication with the uploader has already happened and he has flat-out refused to upload without watermark. His stateed intent is to advertize his website and he says he has already seen an increase in visitorship due to this campaign. It should be noted that none of these images are used in articles on nl.wikipeida, but they do appear in {commonscat} links at the bottom of many (city) pages. This may ultimately force us to remove these sisterwiki templates from those pages. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 17:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::Communication with the uploader has already happened and he has flat-out refused to upload without watermark. His stateed intent is to advertize his website and he says he has already seen an increase in visitorship due to this campaign. It should be noted that none of these images are used in articles on nl.wikipeida, but they do appear in {commonscat} links at the bottom of many (city) pages. This may ultimately force us to remove these sisterwiki templates from those pages. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 17:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1302_Eindhoven_-_HTC_045.jpg&diff=92630470&oldid=92630454