Commons:Deletion requests/Fictional Papal Arms
official reference now available: +
← Older revision
Revision as of 21:42, 20 March 2013
Line 77:
Line 77:
::::::::::::Actually it's very relevant. It happened under Benedict, so that's why we had the image. If it doesn't happen under Francis, then obviously his governance will have held tighter control over such things, and having one of his arms with the tiara would be wrong. '''[[User:Fry1989|Fry1989]]''' '''[[User talk:Fry1989|eh?]]''' 00:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::::Actually it's very relevant. It happened under Benedict, so that's why we had the image. If it doesn't happen under Francis, then obviously his governance will have held tighter control over such things, and having one of his arms with the tiara would be wrong. '''[[User:Fry1989|Fry1989]]''' '''[[User talk:Fry1989|eh?]]''' 00:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Being "wrong" is what was covered in [[Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view]], and the arms of Benedict with tiara are just as wrong, plus the photos in the category were taken a year before the incident. This is a very plausible variant of sufficient quality, and fits right into [[:Category:Special or fictional coats of arms]], much more than many other files in there, as also stated by Anonmoos. [[User:Adelbrecht|Lemmens, Tom]] ([[User talk:Adelbrecht|talk]]) 00:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Being "wrong" is what was covered in [[Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view]], and the arms of Benedict with tiara are just as wrong, plus the photos in the category were taken a year before the incident. This is a very plausible variant of sufficient quality, and fits right into [[:Category:Special or fictional coats of arms]], much more than many other files in there, as also stated by Anonmoos. [[User:Adelbrecht|Lemmens, Tom]] ([[User talk:Adelbrecht|talk]]) 00:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
+
'''Delete''' that things. Fictional Symbols are just private artwork and thus out of scope. That case here is an even worse one, as the images are really misleading.--[[User:Antemister|Antemister]] ([[User talk:Antemister|talk]]) 21:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)