Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/03/Category:Trams in Prague
Category:Trams in Prague: Question.
← Older revision
Revision as of 03:01, 19 March 2013
Line 40:
Line 40:
:The files [[:File:Pivni tramway.jpg]] & [[:File:Nádraží Hostivař, 6815+6909.jpg]] are categorized by the visible trams and the trams are categorized by type. It implies from the basic principle of categorization: „Generally files should only be in the most specific category that exists for certain topic.“ Similarly, if we have a specific category for some king or president, the photos from such category are not categorized directly into the parent categories like "Kings of..." or "Presidents of..." I agree that modular categorization can be uncomfortable for some kinds of usage but it was chosen as the basic principle and have also many big advantages. --[[User:ŠJů|ŠJů]] ([[User talk:ŠJů|talk]]) 17:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
:The files [[:File:Pivni tramway.jpg]] & [[:File:Nádraží Hostivař, 6815+6909.jpg]] are categorized by the visible trams and the trams are categorized by type. It implies from the basic principle of categorization: „Generally files should only be in the most specific category that exists for certain topic.“ Similarly, if we have a specific category for some king or president, the photos from such category are not categorized directly into the parent categories like "Kings of..." or "Presidents of..." I agree that modular categorization can be uncomfortable for some kinds of usage but it was chosen as the basic principle and have also many big advantages. --[[User:ŠJů|ŠJů]] ([[User talk:ŠJů|talk]]) 17:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
+
+
::I get the idea that we are going to go round in circles, and that you very much like the current category scheme, and will oppose any changes at all. Is this a correct assumption? [[User:Liamdavies|Liamdavies]] ([[User talk:Liamdavies|talk]]) 03:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)