31 Mar

Commons:Bots/Requests/SamoaBot

comment
← Older revision
Revision as of 01:02, 31 March 2013
Line 26:
Line 26:

:::*[[User:Ricordisamoa/FPwallpaper.js]] is the source. --[[User:Ricordisamoa|Ricordi]][[User talk:Ricordisamoa|samoa]] 00:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

:::*[[User:Ricordisamoa/FPwallpaper.js]] is the source. --[[User:Ricordisamoa|Ricordi]][[User talk:Ricordisamoa|samoa]] 00:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

::I am still waiting for a response. --[[User:Ricordisamoa|Ricordi]][[User talk:Ricordisamoa|samoa]] 18:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

::I am still waiting for a response. --[[User:Ricordisamoa|Ricordi]][[User talk:Ricordisamoa|samoa]] 18:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::I looked at the images where the test edits were done. They all were large enough and had a 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio, so I agree with EugeneZelenko that what the bot has done is correct. It would be nice, though, if the wide-screen images were classified too.

+

+
:::Also it strikes me that if someone has a screen with a 4:3 aspect ratio, images with a 5:4 aspect ratio won't fit it exactly, but for {{tl|Assessments}} these are classified that same way. An image with, say, an aspect ratio of 13:10, which is between 4:3 and 5:4, would be counted as unsuitable. Perhaps four distinct values would be better in the template, rather than two. I found [[:Category:Images - aspect ratio 4:3]] which only has 23 files in it. Would it be desirable to add categories like that? [[User:Rybec|Rybec]] ([[User talk:Rybec|talk]]) 01:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Bots/Requests/SamoaBot&diff=93641070&oldid=93267049