Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems
User:Foroa
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:59, 16 March 2013
Line 325:
Line 325:
I have been active on talk pages to question a practice. When noone has objected I have made a few changes to policy text. I have awaited reactions to these. When I at last act on these changes, my actions are undone, but my argument stays unanswered. I thus question Foroa's use of admin tools, primarily to the second round of reverts, and request that the user undo these. Secondly I welcome a more thorough discussion on the matter at [[Commons talk:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy]].
I have been active on talk pages to question a practice. When noone has objected I have made a few changes to policy text. I have awaited reactions to these. When I at last act on these changes, my actions are undone, but my argument stays unanswered. I thus question Foroa's use of admin tools, primarily to the second round of reverts, and request that the user undo these. Secondly I welcome a more thorough discussion on the matter at [[Commons talk:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy]].
:/[[User:Dcastor|Dcastor]] ([[User talk:Dcastor|talk]]) 16:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
:/[[User:Dcastor|Dcastor]] ([[User talk:Dcastor|talk]]) 16:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
+
::The user plays with words. While he is stating ''Of course user cats are not topical, but there is no automatic logic to hide non-topical categories''. It is clear that when a category is non topical, as they are called on category displays, then they should be in the other row. And saying that there is no consensus in the discussion, because he seems to be the only one in the world that seems to want his personal name displayed in the topical category list is far-fetched. --[[User:Foroa|Foroa]] ([[User talk:Foroa|talk]]) 16:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)