21 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

‎Pieter Kuiper: new section
← Older revision
Revision as of 23:22, 21 March 2013
Line 161:
Line 161:

Can some people take a look at [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sir Henry Rider Haggard.png]] and Slowking4 comments there (and mine as well, probably)? The user has admitted to deliberately uploading a file here because I challenged it on en.wikipedia ("i uploaded it because you challenged it"), deliberately and incorrectly changed the year of the picture (from ca. 1920s to 1900s) to give it a better chance of survival, and his comments at that discussion became more and more uncivil, with gems liek "your incompetent "malignant assiduity." i will enjoy your crash and burn just like Betacommand. " and "i am not alone in my disdain and contempt for your disruptive hounding of productive editors. they are sharpening their knives, and you had better change your behavior, before they ban you as they banned betacommand." This is all apparently because he doesn't agree with how a case I started about another editor on en.wikipedia finished: in that case, not a single finding of fact, remedy, admonishment, .. against me was made, and basically my position was confirmed by the en.arbcom. To bring that conflict here deliberately, uploading a dubious and challenged photograph, just to get back at me, is very poor behaviour. Some neutral eyes on this would be appreciated. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 08:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Can some people take a look at [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sir Henry Rider Haggard.png]] and Slowking4 comments there (and mine as well, probably)? The user has admitted to deliberately uploading a file here because I challenged it on en.wikipedia ("i uploaded it because you challenged it"), deliberately and incorrectly changed the year of the picture (from ca. 1920s to 1900s) to give it a better chance of survival, and his comments at that discussion became more and more uncivil, with gems liek "your incompetent "malignant assiduity." i will enjoy your crash and burn just like Betacommand. " and "i am not alone in my disdain and contempt for your disruptive hounding of productive editors. they are sharpening their knives, and you had better change your behavior, before they ban you as they banned betacommand." This is all apparently because he doesn't agree with how a case I started about another editor on en.wikipedia finished: in that case, not a single finding of fact, remedy, admonishment, .. against me was made, and basically my position was confirmed by the en.arbcom. To bring that conflict here deliberately, uploading a dubious and challenged photograph, just to get back at me, is very poor behaviour. Some neutral eyes on this would be appreciated. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 08:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
== Pieter Kuiper ==

+

+
Socking again to by-pass his block, adding to his years long obsessive campaign to make Commons a hostile environment by using DRs. See [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=95.200.146.121 95.200.146.121]. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 23:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=93051763&oldid=92961029