22 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

‎Pieter Kuiper
← Older revision
Revision as of 07:04, 22 March 2013
Line 173:
Line 173:

:Yes Pieter Kuiper can raise valid DRs, this was never in doubt, and was the main reason it took more than a year of his problematic behaviour before he was indef blocked. This is not an reason to overlook the long, long obvious pattern of disruptive behaviour you can see at [[User talk:Fæ/Pieter Kuiper]], the many past requests for admin action on this noticeboard[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Pieter+Kuiper&prefix=Commons%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search+in+all+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search] and the many repeated attempts at good faith reconciliation on [[User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper|his user talk page]]. Pieter has yet to appeal his block, and appears actively unwilling to address the reasons for his block, hence his preference for socking to by-pass his block. Before you take on the case for his defence, I suggest you review the background carefully, and think through the aspect of [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] that deals with those who make Commons a hostile environment for other contributors they choose target and hound over a period of years. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 06:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:Yes Pieter Kuiper can raise valid DRs, this was never in doubt, and was the main reason it took more than a year of his problematic behaviour before he was indef blocked. This is not an reason to overlook the long, long obvious pattern of disruptive behaviour you can see at [[User talk:Fæ/Pieter Kuiper]], the many past requests for admin action on this noticeboard[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Pieter+Kuiper&prefix=Commons%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search+in+all+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search] and the many repeated attempts at good faith reconciliation on [[User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper|his user talk page]]. Pieter has yet to appeal his block, and appears actively unwilling to address the reasons for his block, hence his preference for socking to by-pass his block. Before you take on the case for his defence, I suggest you review the background carefully, and think through the aspect of [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] that deals with those who make Commons a hostile environment for other contributors they choose target and hound over a period of years. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 06:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

::well has anyone looked at the reasons for his behaviour ? [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 06:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

::well has anyone looked at the reasons for his behaviour ? [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 06:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::picking one at random from that sub-page of yours, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Evolution_of_ISO_9000_series.svg this] is the first, I can't see the problem there, what was wrong with it ? [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 07:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=93071086&oldid=93070947