Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems
Pieter Kuiper: r
← Older revision
Revision as of 06:54, 22 March 2013
Line 170:
Line 170:
Pieter Kuiper was one of the valuable contributors to Commons as can be seen in this [[:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:KingHussain.JPG|DR]]. Why was this user blocked in the first place? [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|talk]]) 05:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC).
Pieter Kuiper was one of the valuable contributors to Commons as can be seen in this [[:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:KingHussain.JPG|DR]]. Why was this user blocked in the first place? [[User:Hindustanilanguage|Hindustanilanguage]] ([[User talk:Hindustanilanguage|talk]]) 05:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC).
+
+
:Yes Pieter Kuiper can raise valid DRs, this was never in doubt, and was the main reason it took more than a year of his problematic behaviour before he was indef blocked. This is not an reason to overlook the long, long obvious pattern of disruptive behaviour you can see at [[User talk:Fæ/Pieter Kuiper]], the many past requests for admin action on this noticeboard[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Pieter+Kuiper&prefix=Commons%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search+in+all+noticeboard+archives&fulltext=Search] and the many repeated attempts at good faith reconciliation on [[User_talk:Pieter_Kuiper|his user talk page]]. Pieter has yet to appeal his block, and appears actively unwilling to address the reasons for his block, hence his preference for socking to by-pass his block. Before you take on the case for his defence, I suggest you review the background carefully, and think through the aspect of [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] that deals with those who make Commons a hostile environment for other contributors they choose target and hound over a period of years. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 06:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)