Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems
User:Tomascastelazo: r
← Older revision
Revision as of 19:15, 15 March 2013
Line 290:
Line 290:
The following paragraph, part of an exchange, puts into context the use of the term racism, no accusation was made, but it was an example of the unbalanced attitude demonstrated by the involved admin where he can dish out insults and using his own words, “pejorative” statements. So his words and adjectives, because his admin status, are “articulate” and “truthful” and “objective” in opposition to the words used by someone who questions the validity of his opinions, where his words are disruptive, insults and the like.
The following paragraph, part of an exchange, puts into context the use of the term racism, no accusation was made, but it was an example of the unbalanced attitude demonstrated by the involved admin where he can dish out insults and using his own words, “pejorative” statements. So his words and adjectives, because his admin status, are “articulate” and “truthful” and “objective” in opposition to the words used by someone who questions the validity of his opinions, where his words are disruptive, insults and the like.
−
"Just as you qualify the use of my legitimate vocabulary as pejorative, assigning a negative connotation to legitimate issues and my motives, I could then express the notion that your censoring acts are harassment and driven by racism. I see no legitimate reason as to why you nominated this image for deletion given that it is a legitimate artwork expresses by way of parody the social phenomena of censorship."
+
"Just as you qualify the use of my legitimate vocabulary as pejorative, assigning a negative connotation to legitimate issues and my motives, I could then express the notion that your censoring acts are harassment and driven by racism. I see no legitimate reason as to why you nominated this image for deletion given that it is a legitimate artwork expresses by way of parody the social phenomena of censorship." {{unsigned|187.191.6.140}}
+
+
:You shouldn't write here anonymously, as this is what is being called a block evasion. If you have something to state, you should do it on your talk page, although after your recent comments there I don't believe anymore that any comprehension can be expected. --[[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] 19:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)