15 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

‎User:Tomascastelazo
← Older revision
Revision as of 01:58, 15 March 2013
Line 278:
Line 278:

*{{support}} (as written). I endorse Dschwen's comment of 17:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC). Tomascastelazo's 14 March DR nominations (see above) are disruptive. I'm dubious that the "racism" comment is blockable, but it is not in keeping with the advice of [[COM:MELLOW]]. While it is a pity that the result of the 2013 [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg|deletion discussion]] is inconsistent with the 2011 result, such is bound to occur. Moreover, should our understanding of copyright law change, [[COM:UNDEL]] may be used restore images that were improperly deleted. [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 23:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{support}} (as written). I endorse Dschwen's comment of 17:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC). Tomascastelazo's 14 March DR nominations (see above) are disruptive. I'm dubious that the "racism" comment is blockable, but it is not in keeping with the advice of [[COM:MELLOW]]. While it is a pity that the result of the 2013 [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg|deletion discussion]] is inconsistent with the 2011 result, such is bound to occur. Moreover, should our understanding of copyright law change, [[COM:UNDEL]] may be used restore images that were improperly deleted. [[User:Wsiegmund|Walter Siegmund]] [[User_talk:Wsiegmund|(talk)]] 23:56, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{o}} such a long block. While Tomas' behaviour might well be considered as disruptive, I urge you not to make a mountain out of every molehill. One should consider the character of individual contributors. Tomas has always been direct and a bit harsh in his comments as I personally may testify but one should take his outings with a grain of salt an not immediately retaliate with a long block. I find some of the admins here currently a bit too trigger-happy. [[user:Biopics| B.p.]] 00:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{o}} such a long block. While Tomas' behaviour might well be considered as disruptive, I urge you not to make a mountain out of every molehill. One should consider the character of individual contributors. Tomas has always been direct and a bit harsh in his comments as I personally may testify but one should take his outings with a grain of salt an not immediately retaliate with a long block. I find some of the admins here currently a bit too trigger-happy. [[user:Biopics| B.p.]] 00:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

+
*{{support}}. Two weeks would be the better block length (his last block was one week, the two week block before that was quickly lifted). This is not about comments that are '' a bit harsh''. The block is justified as a safeguard against binding volunteer time with discussions around pointy actions. Thomas is a long time contributor and he should know better not to fight against windmills like that. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 01:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=92599464&oldid=92596016