Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections
Microtoerisme
← Older revision
Revision as of 00:57, 16 March 2013
Line 70:
Line 70:
Please block {{User3|Microtoerisme||}} for bulkuploading images with watermarklinkspam [[User:Hans Erren|Hans Erren]] ([[User talk:Hans Erren|talk]]) 21:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Please block {{User3|Microtoerisme||}} for bulkuploading images with watermarklinkspam [[User:Hans Erren|Hans Erren]] ([[User talk:Hans Erren|talk]]) 21:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
:{{Done|Blocked}} for spamming. [[Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Microtoerisme|DR]]: [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1302_Eindhoven_-_HTC_045.jpg|Uploaded thousands of images with a spam watermark]] with the intent to advertise (spam on userpage, stated intentions). [[User:Mono|'''Mono''']] 00:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
:{{Done|Blocked}} for spamming. [[Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Microtoerisme|DR]]: [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1302_Eindhoven_-_HTC_045.jpg|Uploaded thousands of images with a spam watermark]] with the intent to advertise (spam on userpage, stated intentions). [[User:Mono|'''Mono''']] 00:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
−
::Just to clarify, he was blocked more for ''intent'' than for ''actions''? If he had kept his mouth shut, or claimed it was simply a harmless attribution watermark, he would not have gotten a block? Or was it the ''number'' of images uploaded? If he had uploaded 14 instaed of 1400 he would not have been blocked? – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 00:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
+
::Just to clarify, he was blocked more for ''intent'' than for ''actions''? If he had kept his mouth shut, or claimed it was simply a harmless attribution watermark, he would not have gotten a block? Or was it the ''number'' of images uploaded? If he had uploaded 14 instead of 1400 he would not have been blocked? – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 00:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)