22 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

‎User for Discussion (UFD)
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:48, 22 March 2013
Line 226:
Line 226:

== User for Discussion (UFD) ==

== User for Discussion (UFD) ==

As far as I can cross-check the public database identifying the user behind [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrrling&diff=93072351&oldid=92988313 this] vague message on my talkpage with the everyday encounters associated with the work here in the passing year, it's again to remark that this user, who has now apparently mumbled to me about their innermost pulses of instability, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Foroa runs an account] of which most of the edits are reverted regularly, or disputed by editors; utilized for causeless abusing of this website's interface with a hardcore long-time observed disruptive conduct that has left no guideline unviolated. This is rare that a user earns having their "User contributions" on my watchlist for routine monitoring. It is thus asked why we as an idealistic collective of wiki-devoted editors have to ongoingly withstand such under-helpful patterns from an account who has had questionably any sensible contribution while dedicated only to survivability, continuous personal bias and harassments. Please see how we can get this cleared out to assure the ruturn of the Commons we know and safe environment & integrity for millions of daily readers and users. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 16:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

As far as I can cross-check the public database identifying the user behind [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrrling&diff=93072351&oldid=92988313 this] vague message on my talkpage with the everyday encounters associated with the work here in the passing year, it's again to remark that this user, who has now apparently mumbled to me about their innermost pulses of instability, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Foroa runs an account] of which most of the edits are reverted regularly, or disputed by editors; utilized for causeless abusing of this website's interface with a hardcore long-time observed disruptive conduct that has left no guideline unviolated. This is rare that a user earns having their "User contributions" on my watchlist for routine monitoring. It is thus asked why we as an idealistic collective of wiki-devoted editors have to ongoingly withstand such under-helpful patterns from an account who has had questionably any sensible contribution while dedicated only to survivability, continuous personal bias and harassments. Please see how we can get this cleared out to assure the ruturn of the Commons we know and safe environment & integrity for millions of daily readers and users. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 16:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
:Sorry, but you'll have to make yuor point a bit clearer if you want people to understand you. Are you implying that most of Foroa's contributions are reverted? The contribution list you link to does not support that claim at all. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 16:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=93096248&oldid=93096142