Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

Sorry for this manifesto. hoping good things now will start from it, the current situation is burdensome.
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:44, 22 March 2013
Line 223:
Line 223:
 

 

 
When I raised a proposal to upmerge all pictures it was opposed, I have tried to bring up numerous solutions where the categorisation by number system could sit side by side with a "all Tatra T3 photos in ONE category" system, but it is opposed no end. And all possible solutions I've brought up have been called "incorrect nor nonsensical" and "fundamentally incompatible with categorization principles". I don't feel that the editors in question want any change, and as such will argue tooth and nail against any change. This is why I would appreciate outside voices to weigh in, there has to be a solution in there somewhere, I just don't feel I can get one by myself. Can some admins have a look and maybe make a proposal or decision to solve this quandary? I hope that this dispute can be solved in a way that makes all happy, but don't see it happening without the input from others. I would also ask what precedent this highly detailed level of categorisation sets for the commons as a project (it really does make it unworkable trying to find pictures unless you are looking for a picture of a specific tram, which I'm not), it could/would apply to all rail vehicles by number as well as aircraft, ships etc, it is about on par with sub-categorising cars by colour ("Blue BMW M3s" etc) or by registration number. [[User:Liamdavies|Liamdavies]] ([[User talk:Liamdavies|talk]]) 15:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 
When I raised a proposal to upmerge all pictures it was opposed, I have tried to bring up numerous solutions where the categorisation by number system could sit side by side with a "all Tatra T3 photos in ONE category" system, but it is opposed no end. And all possible solutions I've brought up have been called "incorrect nor nonsensical" and "fundamentally incompatible with categorization principles". I don't feel that the editors in question want any change, and as such will argue tooth and nail against any change. This is why I would appreciate outside voices to weigh in, there has to be a solution in there somewhere, I just don't feel I can get one by myself. Can some admins have a look and maybe make a proposal or decision to solve this quandary? I hope that this dispute can be solved in a way that makes all happy, but don't see it happening without the input from others. I would also ask what precedent this highly detailed level of categorisation sets for the commons as a project (it really does make it unworkable trying to find pictures unless you are looking for a picture of a specific tram, which I'm not), it could/would apply to all rail vehicles by number as well as aircraft, ships etc, it is about on par with sub-categorising cars by colour ("Blue BMW M3s" etc) or by registration number. [[User:Liamdavies|Liamdavies]] ([[User talk:Liamdavies|talk]]) 15:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 
+

 
+
== User for doscussion (UFD) ==
 
+
As far as I can cross-check the public database identifying the user behind [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrrling&diff=93072351&oldid=92988313 this] vague message on my talkpage with the everyday encounters associated with the work here in the passing year, it's again to remark that this user, who has now apparently mumbled to me about their innermost pulses of instability, [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Foroa runs an account] of which most of the edits are reverted regularly, or disputed by editors; utilized for causeless abusing of this website's interface with a hardcore long-time observed disruptive conduct that has left no guideline unviolated. This is rare that a user earns having their "User contributions" on my watchlist for routine monitoring. It is thus asked why we as an idealistic collective of wiki-devoted editors have to ongoingly withstand such under-helpful patterns from an account who has had questionably any sensible contribution while dedicated only to survivability, continuous personal bias and harassments. Please see how we can get this cleared out to assure the ruturn of the Commons we know and safe environment & integrity for millions of daily readers and users. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 16:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=93096031&oldid=93094438