Commons:Administrators' noticeboard
Freedom of panorama — we do not use good argument/documentation: new section
← Older revision
Revision as of 03:58, 22 March 2013
Line 197:
Line 197:
According to the certain image descriptions [[User:Enzo1999]] uploads porn images of children. I suggest to stop that. -- [[User:Ies|Ies]] ([[User talk:Ies|talk]]) 15:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
According to the certain image descriptions [[User:Enzo1999]] uploads porn images of children. I suggest to stop that. -- [[User:Ies|Ies]] ([[User talk:Ies|talk]]) 15:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
:Deleted, oversighted and account lock requested at Meta by various folk. Thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|Herby]] [[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]] 16:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
:Deleted, oversighted and account lock requested at Meta by various folk. Thanks --[[User:Herbythyme|Herby]] [[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]] 16:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
+
+
== Freedom of panorama — we do not use good argument/documentation ==
+
+
I have been looking at the arguments that we have made to restrict [[Commons:Freedom of panorama|Freedom of panorama]], specifically for Slovenia, and Belgium, and to my view we have documented our cases and evidence very poorly. Very hard to challenge a close to non-existent argument with names, or clear reference to specific