24 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

‎Is File:Woman in orgasm.jpg identifiable?: new section
← Older revision
Revision as of 12:24, 24 March 2013
Line 239:
Line 239:

Hey guyz. Please see if it's OK to apply a lock to the page of [[:Category:Archaeological sites on the Golan Heights]] now that it turned out that the principle of preferring a discussion over editfight was rejected by my counterpart on this theme - leaving the category subject to unilateral recat ignoring many explanations. The [[:Category talk:Archaeological sites on the Golan Heights|category talk page]] can show you what's on. From my own side, it's about an insistence to incorrectly overparent this geographical category. When approaching to lock, please be sure that the older version is top. I'm so hopeful that the user then begins to discuss sensibly. Thankz! [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 19:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey guyz. Please see if it's OK to apply a lock to the page of [[:Category:Archaeological sites on the Golan Heights]] now that it turned out that the principle of preferring a discussion over editfight was rejected by my counterpart on this theme - leaving the category subject to unilateral recat ignoring many explanations. The [[:Category talk:Archaeological sites on the Golan Heights|category talk page]] can show you what's on. From my own side, it's about an insistence to incorrectly overparent this geographical category. When approaching to lock, please be sure that the older version is top. I'm so hopeful that the user then begins to discuss sensibly. Thankz! [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 19:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:Lock doesn't appear to neccessary, it takes two to edit war and since [[User:Orrling|Orrling]] is blocked for two weeks (on another matter) it is unlikely that the edit war will resume any time zone.--[[User:KTo288|KTo288]] ([[User talk:KTo288|talk]]) 13:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

:Lock doesn't appear to neccessary, it takes two to edit war and since [[User:Orrling|Orrling]] is blocked for two weeks (on another matter) it is unlikely that the edit war will resume any time zone.--[[User:KTo288|KTo288]] ([[User talk:KTo288|talk]]) 13:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
== Is [[:File:Woman in orgasm.jpg]] identifiable? ==

+

+
I've started a deletion request about the image at [[:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman in orgasm.jpg]]. The user who uploaded the image ([[User:Ohconfucius]]) says that there is no need to ask the subject of the image for permission to use the picture since she is not identifiable. I vehemently disagree with that (and so does [[COM:PEOPLE]]). At the deletion request, Ohconfucius says that he'd like an administrator to weigh in on whether the subject is identifiable or not, hence my notice here. Any comments would be much appreciated. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 12:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=93191615&oldid=93164835