22 Mar

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

‎User for Discussion (UFD)
← Older revision
Revision as of 17:13, 22 March 2013
Line 228:
Line 228:

:Sorry, but you'll have to make your point a bit clearer if you want people to understand you. Are you implying that most of Foroa's contributions are reverted? The contribution list you link to does not support that claim at all. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 16:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:Sorry, but you'll have to make your point a bit clearer if you want people to understand you. Are you implying that most of Foroa's contributions are reverted? The contribution list you link to does not support that claim at all. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 16:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+
::Yes, of course, the account in question is regularly monitored to brake incorrect edits and most records are eventually either rolled-back (directly or indirectly) or are a subject of multiple-editors' contest. At the ground of my point, is the callout for our administrative-level functions to identify the ill situation brought about by what seems to be an abusive account focused at making the life of prolific, good-faith editors unbearably tough. Countless examples have been given previously throughout the year or so, please attend my links [[User talk:Orrling#The edit war on User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands is not acceptable|here]] for a start. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 17:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=93097298&oldid=93096268