Category talk:Subnational entities
This page is of no distinctive apprehension of any term justifying being a separate category from Category:Country subdivisions: + comment
← Older revision
Revision as of 14:13, 21 March 2013
Line 125:
Line 125:
== This page is of no distinctive apprehension of any term justifying being a separate category from [[:Category:Country subdivisions]] ==
== This page is of no distinctive apprehension of any term justifying being a separate category from [[:Category:Country subdivisions]] ==
[[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 14:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 14:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
+
::I agree this category structure is a mess, and there are subcats here that may or may not belong. However, I am also not sure that subnational entity = country subdivision. As stated above, subnational entities are a type of country subdivision, the two terms are not interchangeable, and the former typically has a degree of autonomy that not all types of subdivisions enjoy. That doesn't mean I am wed to the term "subnational entities", but I do feel a distinction needs to be maintained between subdivisions with a degree of legal autonomy and those that are merely created for administrative convenience. In any event, you should propose how you envision a new category structure working. You seem to have created a whole new category tree for something called "subnational regions", which seems to a whole new level of duplication (but I can't say for sure, because it's not clear what you propose big picture). --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 14:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)