23 Mar

Category talk:Archaeological sites on the Golan Heights

ce and fix mark up
← Older revision
Revision as of 13:41, 23 March 2013
Line 9:
Line 9:

:::::::::Dear mister, I'm afraid I need to say this now but your tone and temper are unfortunately not within our codes of conduct here on Wiki. As frustrating for you as it might be, if you wish to constitute a helpful discussion for your cause you must employ a different ratio of usage of reasonings vs personal attacks and show that you roughly understand how the Wikimedia environment works. For now, you appear to disagree with the elementary need to leave unchanged the version(s) you're discontent with (which are the older ones) ''until'' achieving agreement by means of a transparent discourse. In this light, I'll have to ask for administrative help in locking this category since you demonstrate failure to assume the Commons preference to avoid editfights. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 19:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:::::::::Dear mister, I'm afraid I need to say this now but your tone and temper are unfortunately not within our codes of conduct here on Wiki. As frustrating for you as it might be, if you wish to constitute a helpful discussion for your cause you must employ a different ratio of usage of reasonings vs personal attacks and show that you roughly understand how the Wikimedia environment works. For now, you appear to disagree with the elementary need to leave unchanged the version(s) you're discontent with (which are the older ones) ''until'' achieving agreement by means of a transparent discourse. In this light, I'll have to ask for administrative help in locking this category since you demonstrate failure to assume the Commons preference to avoid editfights. [[User:Orrling|Orrling]][[User talk:Orrling|talk]] 19:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

−
has been added back to the category, given that not all the Golan heights are occupied territory, it is not a case of unacceptable overcategorisation. Given that a large part of the Golan heights are occupied territory,
+
[[:Category:Archaeological sites in Israel] has been added back to this category, given that not all the Golan heights are occupied territory, it is not a case of simple overcategorisation. Given that a large part of the Golan heights are occupied territory,
−
. is an appropriate category.
+
[[:Category:Archaeological sites in territories occupied by Israel]]. is an appropriate category.

If this is not acceptable. I suggest the following compromises (however as with all compromises these would have problems of their own)

If this is not acceptable. I suggest the following compromises (however as with all compromises these would have problems of their own)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Archaeological_sites_on_the_Golan_Heights&diff=93138327&oldid=93138257