16 Mar

Commons:Village pump/Copyright

‎Another exotic license
← Older revision
Revision as of 03:24, 16 March 2013
Line 277:
Line 277:

:: What's their job? Surely not to carefully check their works to see whether or not they can use them, given as they have no reason to do that (the 13th Amendment protects them in most cases) and every reason not to.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 21:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:: What's their job? Surely not to carefully check their works to see whether or not they can use them, given as they have no reason to do that (the 13th Amendment protects them in most cases) and every reason not to.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 21:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
:::May be if we fix those licenses so they answer more questions than they raise, Than the "bunch of amateurs at Wikipedia" would not be rediscovering the same inconsistencies. Andy if you read the initial post, the whole discussion started at strange PD license (not using a template) that '''requires''' attribution. Since bunch of files use it I moved the content of it to {{tl|PD-FLGov-PhotoColl}} and then we found {{tl|Image from the Florida Photographic Collection}} which seems to be related. It would be nice if we could reconcile those two templates, and possibly merge them. --[[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt|talk]]) 03:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

== A copyright concern? ==

== A copyright concern? ==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=92656926&oldid=92649316